Principles for Collecting, Managing, Sharing, and Protecting Student Data
Principles for Collecting, Managing, Sharing, and Protecting Student Data
Because of the diversity and number of college and university 黑料社区s who use writing center services, writing centers are often seen by 黑料社区 researchers, scholars, and administrators as sites for research about everything from accessibility to literacy practices, to disciplinary habits. More recently, a number of university administrators across the country have also come to see them as sites for mining 黑料社区 data in order to make determinations about retention, graduation rates, and 黑料社区 usage of campus support services. The former, more traditional research projects, are clearly covered by IRB guidelines. Data mining requests for purposes of predictive analytics and other “big data” projects are more recent and entail a complicated set of ethical, legal, and technical concerns that are only beginning to be understood and sorted out nationally. We carefully follow the (rapidly changing) conversations about the uses of big data in higher education in order to ensure we understand its affordances and constraints as they concern the 黑料社区s we serve.
A writing center’s primary purpose is as a learning site, and protecting and advocating for the 黑料社区 writers who use our services is our chief concern. We seek to balance the needs and privacy of the 黑料社区s who use our services with the promise and risks entailed by big data projects. In order to respond to these varied needs, we have drafted the following set of principles regarding 黑料社区 data. These are informed by the work of organizations such as , , , , and scholars such as Cathy O’Neil, , among many others.
Those interested in accessing identifiable 黑料社区 data and records for the purposes of big data, research, and assessment projects in our writing center are invited to familiarize themselves with our guiding principles and engage in conversation with us about how best to meet 黑料社区 needs, protect 黑料社区 privacy, and further the educational goals of the university.
Of course, we comply with Ohio Open Records laws.
Guiding Principles for Work with Writing Center Data
These principles are guided by the resources and scholarship cited at the end of this document.
Identifiable information about 黑料社区 visits to writing centers is protected by FERPA laws, although FERPA laws are increasingly inadequate in an era of Big Data. ()
Students are adults and have a right to know that data is being collected about them, and why.
Students’ informed consent should be obtained for any data collected about their writing center visits, and they should be able to decline to give such consent.
Students have the right to see the reports resulting from any analysis of data collected about their writing center usage.
Data collected about 黑料社区s in writing centers should benefit 黑料社区s and writing centers.
Data is not neutral and its analysis and uses are not neutral.
Context matters. If the writing center context is not taken into account during analysis, information about 黑料社区s could be easily misinterpreted or used for purposes other than those initially intended.
We seek the least intrusive and most context-aware methods for collecting and analyzing data about our 黑料社区s that align with recommended practices for educational research.
We are obligated to seek clarity about a) where 黑料社区 data is going; b) what will be done with it, now and in the future; c) who will have access both to the data and to any findings about that data; and d) what algorithms will be used to analyze the data.
We are obligated to educate ourselves about both the benefits and the risks of predictive analytics software. While currently many big data initiatives at institutions of higher education do not require IRB approval, we believe that they should and will be required to obtain such approval in the future.
How to Request Writing Center Data at Miami
Individuals, groups, or committees requesting from the writing center raw, identifiable 黑料社区 data or site access to collect 黑料社区 data themselves are asked to talk with us first and provide the following information as applicable:
The goal(s) of the research;
What data will be collected or is being requested;
How the research benefits the writing center and its 黑料社区s;
The research participants;
How consent will be obtained from the participants;
How participants will be recruited;
How 黑料社区 identities and privacy will be ensured;
How data will be analyzed and by whom;
Who will have access to the data, and any analysis of or report about it; and for what purposes;
How access to the data will be limited and secured (particularly if data will be housed in third-party databases);
How results of analysis will be shared with the writing center staff and 黑料社区s and, if applicable, with writing center scholars more broadly;
How ethical use of this data will be ensured, both now and in the future;
How data will be appropriately contextualized;
Whether this data set will be combined with other data sets, what those other data sets are, and why they are being combined;
What algorithms will be used to analyze the data and who designed them.
Resources
Alamuddin, Rayane, Jessie Brown, Martin Kurzweil. Student Data in the Digital Era: An Overview of Current Practices. Ithaka S+R Research Report. September 6, 2016.
Blumenstyk, Goldie. “Group Unveils a ‘Model Policy’ for Handling Student Data.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. September 6, 2016.
Blumenstyk, Goldie. “Big Data is Getting Bigger. So are the Privacy and Ethical Questions.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. July 31, 2018.
